What social commentary does Mark Twain…

In “The ¬£1,000,000 Bank-Note,” Twain employs satire to underscore the influence of wealth and the behaviors it provokes among different social classes in nineteenth-century England. An early instance of this satire occurs when Henry interacts with the proprietors of the eating house and tailor shop, both of whom perceive him as an affluent gentleman and allow him to purchase goods on credit due to his presumed status. For instance, when Henry cautions the tailor that he might take an indefinite time to settle his debts, the tailor responds nonchalantly, stating, “Indefinitely! It’s a weak word, sir, a weak word. Eternally‚Äîthat’s the word, sir.” His choice of the word eternally highlights his eagerness to extend credit based on Henry’s assumed wealth. Similar reactions are seen from other shopkeepers who are quick to offer Henry luxuries and necessities simply due to the credibility of his million-pound note. If any of these merchants were aware of Henry’s actual financial struggles, they would have likely refused him credit. Instead, they cater to his requests, blinded by their belief in his supposed class and affluence. Twain further critiques the societal value placed on wealth through the respect Henry gains throughout London. When Henry learns of his friend Lloyd’s financial issues, he encourages Lloyd to leverage his name to sell Lloyd’s mine, asserting, “I know all about that mine, of course; I know its immense value, and can swear to it if anybody wishes it. You shall sell out inside of the fortnight for three million cash, using my name freely, and we’ll divide, share and share alike.” Within a day, Henry’s endorsement makes the mine a topic of conversation across London. Eventually, “when the month was up at last,” the mine is sold, resulting in a profit of a million dollars for both Henry and Lloyd. Henry’s reputation has escalated to a point where he can now influence societal opinions. Through this narrative, Twain’s satire reveals the folly and peril of valuing individuals solely based on their wealth or its illusion, rather than genuine traits like integrity or compassion, as society places more importance on Henry’s perceived wealth and class than on his true character.