Answer
The correct answer is C. A strong counterclaim to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford would posit that Dred Scott and his family are citizens due to their birth in the United States, thereby entitling them to all the rights afforded by the Constitution. Chief Justice Roger Taney’s ruling determined that African Americans, regardless of their freedom status, were not recognized as U.S. citizens and lacked the capacity to sue in federal court. An effective counter to this reasoning would state: Because Dred Scott and his family were born in the United States, they qualify as citizens with full constitutional rights. This counter-groups attempts to refute the idea that one’s ancestry or past condition of slavery could nullify their rights, asserting instead that being born in the U.S. guarantees citizenship and its rights.
Related Questions
- Read the excerpt and then complete the sentences that follow. To an Athlete Dying Young by A. E. Hou
- Which event occurred third in the sequence: A) Puritan preachers opposed both new theaters, B) The T
- Why was Gilman advised to “never touch pen, brush, or pencil again”? A. Her doctor believed that she
- Which two parts of the excerpt from “Oliver Twist” by Charles Dickens indicate sarcasm?
- What does the parallelism in this excerpt emphasize? Is it the speakerβΓΓ΄s Irish nationality, the sp
- Which two lines in this excerpt from the poem “Dreams” by Edgar Allan Poe use enjambment? Oh! that m
- What is the best way to describe the type of speaker Chase is during his discussion about providing
- In four to five sentences, outline a brief plan for your presentation. Describe the steps you will t
- Which revision of sentence 3 makes it more precise?
- Which sentences contain possible synonyms for the word “labyrinth”? Check all that apply. The busine