Short Answer 
Wollstonecraft critiques male reasoning, suggesting it is often biased and aimed at justifying existing prejudices rather than seeking truth. Her arguments emphasize the need for unbiased rational analysis to counter gender biases. The conclusion drawn from her text supports the idea that she views many men as prejudiced, thereby illustrating her critical stance on societal influences on reasoning.
Step 1: Understanding Wollstonecraft’s Perspective
Wollstonecraft asserts that most men use their reasoning not for seeking truth but rather to support their existing prejudices. This indicates her belief that male perspectives may be inherently biased. It’s important to grasp that her critique is focused on how societal norms influence reasoning abilities.
Step 2: Analyzing the Text Evidence
The phrase ‚ÄúMen, in general, seem to employ their reason to justify prejudices‚Äù directly illustrates Wollstonecraft’s view about the limitations of male reasoning. By evaluating this evidence, one can see that it serves as a key piece in understanding her arguments against gender biases. This approach highlights her standpoint on the need for rational analysis free from societal influence.
Step 3: Identifying the Correct Interpretation
The conclusion that Wollstonecraft believes all men are prejudiced and incapable of truthful reasoning is valid and well-supported by her text. A proper interpretation, especially if compared to given choices, confirms that the second option correctly encapsulates her argument. Thus, recognizing this helps in fully understanding the context of her critique.