Short Answer
The Armenians were not aggressors against the Turks before the genocide, as historical evidence shows they were in a stronger socioeconomic position. The genocide was motivated by the Young Turks’ desire for a homogenous Muslim state and intensified by fears during World War I that Armenians might ally with enemy forces.
Step 1: Understand the Historical Context
The statement in question suggests that the Armenians were the aggressors against the Turks before the genocide. This is incorrect, as there are no historical records indicating that the Armenians ever enacted genocide on the Turks. Instead, Armenians were often economically and educationally better off than their Turkish counterparts prior to the events of 1915.
Step 2: Analyze the Motivations Behind the Genocide
The motivations for the Armenian genocide were deeply rooted in the socio-political landscape of the Ottoman Empire. The Young Turks, aiming to promote a homogeneous Muslim state, viewed the Armenians, a predominantly Christian population, as a threat to their agenda. Their desire to eliminate ethnic and religious diversity was a significant factor in the atrocities that followed.
Step 3: Consider the Impact of World War I
The backdrop of World War I intensified the Turks’ fears regarding the Armenians. With the war ongoing, the Ottoman leaders speculated that Armenians might side with the Russians, who were considered adversaries. This fear further fueled the rationale for their violent campaign against the Armenian population, solidifying the decision to carry out a systematic genocide.